The Philosophical Counseling of Mythos Against the Scientific Pride of Logos

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18712080

Keywords:

Mythos, logos, philosophy, scientificity, sincerety, knowledge, virtue

Abstract

This text examines the fundamental differences between mythological thought in ancient times and logos, which represents a philosophical and scientific foundation, as well as the deep connection between these two concepts. In our view, myths are an attempt to make sense of human existence through sincerity and lived experience, rather than providing rational explanations for life. It is argued that scientific progress and the development of logos have isolated humans by turning them into external observers, whereas myths preserve social cohesion and an inner closeness. Topics such as the human characteristics of gods, the transition of the universe from chaos to cosmos, and the spiritual vitality of matter are detailed through the works of figures such as Homer and Hesiod. Ultimately, myths are presented as an indispensable type of knowledge that forms the basis of philosophy, aims for harmony with nature, and reflects the spiritual roots of human history.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Altuner, İlyas. (2026). The Philosophical Counseling of Mythos Against the Scientific Pride of Logos. Logos: Philosophical Counseling and Practices, 1(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18712080

Issue

Section

Research Articles